Hi,
On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 04:36:57PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 07:30:50AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> > New rebase due to 73d60ac385a.
>
> I have been looking at this patch, and can get behind the data
> gathered here in terms of being able to tune things
Thanks!
>
> So my suggestion for the moment would be to be more frugal (yeah I
> know, sorry..) and limit ourselves to four fields: deadlock_timeout,
> requests, fastpath and timeouts. Three fields to compare with
> requests, one for each GUC.
That's fine by me. We could still add the others in the future if we feel the
need. Done that way in the attached.
> Regarding the implementation, you are right to use a fixed-sized stats
> kind for the job. I can see a lot of code has been copy-pasted from
> pgstat_io.c, then slightly adjusted to fit into the picture. That's
> fine here, it makes the implementation straight-forward to read.
Yeah, no need to reinvent the wheel.
> Regarding the documentation, listing all the values for locktype is a
> recipe for rot. I'd suggest to remove the list instead, with only a
> link referring to pg_locks to avoid the duplication.
Makes sense, done that way. Makes me think that we could do the same for pg_locks
and just link it to the Wait Events of Type Lock? (Table 27.11.)
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
