On Mon, Jan 05, 2026 at 11:00:00PM +0400, Alexander Law wrote:
> I thought that the initial spelling was meant to reference bufHdr variable
> as if it was declared locally as we can see this name in other functions in
> bufmgr.c (at 5d508736).
Yeah, I was under the same impression as yours. The older pattern
could not be found in the tree, the new one is all spread around.
> By the way, I've just noticed that I fixed only one out of two typos in
> "parititoned", so it's still spelled wrong: "partititoned". Sorry.
Meh. And here I thought that I read all these diffs correctly. Will
adjust in a bit.
--
Michael
