On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 02:40:24PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I am also looking at what it would take to implement what the brutal
> approach I have mentioned upthread. This requires a bit more
> reorganization than what I had in mind initially. By putting first in
> the patch set some of the parts that are kind of relevant with the two
> designs, things seem to be a bit leaner. I need to spend a few more
> hours on that beforebeing sure, though..
I am still working on redesigning the patch set to avoid the pointer
redirection and the callbacks assigned to the vartags.
One thing that stands out for me is that I am going to need the oid8
data type anyway, to be store the 8-byte values in the catalogs, with
a C type to mark some of the TOAST apis with it across the board, so I
would like to apply that to move this part out of the way (0001 only)
and move the needle. If there are any objections to that, please feel
free.
--
Michael
