On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 02:22:02PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> The point of such changes would be to lift this barrier at some point,
> which is what the other thread I am mentioning upthread is also
> pointing at. It does not change the fact that this code is currently
> not portable as written: off_t can be 4 or 8 bytes depending on the
> environment, and pgoff_t exists to be a stable alternative. This
> relates as well to the use of long in the tree, all coming down to
> WIN32.
Getting rid of a couple more long assumptions while removing one
portability comment from buffile.c is appealing while the change is
not invasive, so applied.
--
Michael
