On Fri, Dec 12, 2025 at 12:48:52PM -0600, Sami Imseih wrote:
> As far as testing, I did not think it's worth it since in the cases out
> there now a NULL void * will result in an error when calling
> LWLockNewTrancheId.
I think we should pass NULL to all the existing in-tree calls to
GetNamedDSMSegment(), except for perhaps a new test in test_dsm_registry
that verifies the pointer value in the initialization function. In all the
other cases, there's no issue with hard-coding the tranche names, so we can
keep those simple.
--
nathan
