On Wed, Dec 03, 2025 at 02:59:16PM -0600, Sami Imseih wrote:
> Yes, that's true. It will be hard to find other good use-cases that
> can't be solved with a global variable, but we can also say this is
> a low-cost change, so why not just do it.
Well, for one, it requires all existing extensions that use
GetNamedDSMSegment() to be updated. That might not be too terrible, but in
any case, I think we need a stronger reason than the simplicity of the
implementation to do something.
--
nathan
