On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 10:26:32AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> This is the same kind of idea as 7f798aca1d5 and ef8fe693606, as their presence
> could cause risks of hiding actual type mismatches in the future or silently
> discarding qualifiers. I think that it also improves readability.
Seems reasonable to me.
> Note that it generated more that what is in the attached. I chose not to remove
> some of them (mainly arithmetic ones) to keep the patch focused on what matters
> here.
Can you give an example of what you are talking about here?
--
nathan
