On Sat, Nov 22, 2025 at 03:26:19AM -0500, Corey Huinker wrote:
> I'm open to it, but there was significant pushback to having tight validity
> checks on other stats types.
Yeah, I am not sure that there is much value in having strict checks
for the values. Some control over the arguments listed in a single
object is much more valuable as these are easy to check in the input
functions.
> The more things that we make errors, the more chances we have to breaking a
> dump/restore. Granted, such values should never happen, but odd things do
> happen.
Indeed. Like the existing import functions, these should not lead to
hard failures, but WARNING-level reports.
--
Michael
