Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17
Date
Msg-id aSHskqn2YcrZrkcP@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 01:13:50PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 21.11.25 01:49, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Actually, another discussion would be why we have src/tools/codelines in
> > the git tree at all.  I added it in 2005 to use in counting code lines,
> > and I thought we could consider it our standard method, but I am not
> > sure anyone aside from me even uses it, and it is clear there are
> > multiple methods people consider valid.  Should we just remove it?
> 
> I think so.

Removed.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: ocean_li_996
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix logical decoding not track transaction duringSNAPBUILD_BUILDING_SNAPSHOT
Next
From: Bernice Southey
Date:
Subject: Re: Add notification on BEGIN ATOMIC SQL functions using temp relations