Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nico Williams
Subject Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support
Date
Msg-id aSChmBhT/dilPDwP@ubby
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support  (* Neustradamus * <neustradamus@hotmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 08:30:42AM +0000, * Neustradamus * wrote:
> Dear Heikki,
> 
> Thanks for your answer.
> 
> Several people would like to deprecate "tls-server-end-point" (RFC 5929) like Simon Josefsson (author of several
RFCs)because RFC 9266 exists since July 2022:
 

We must either fix or _replace_ tls-server-end-point (TSEP), but we
cannot not have end-point-style CB.  I followed up to Simon with reasons
for why.  Those followups will also answer Heikki's questions about
pros/cons.

That said, for _PG_ I think the exporter CB are almost certainly better.

Nico
-- 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nico Williams
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support
Next
From: Nico Williams
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support