Re: pg_utility ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christoph Berg
Subject Re: pg_utility ?
Date
Msg-id aR7gD5RZzwYwzopK@msg.df7cb.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_utility ?  (Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>)
List pgsql-hackers
Re: Andreas Karlsson
> > Perhaps pg_util? ("pg" is taken by that classic pager thingy.)
> 
> I like the name pg_util. In the MySQL world it is called mysqladmin, which
> is a does of pg_ctl and tools like createdb.

"pg_adm" would also be a candidate. (Or is that too close to pgadmin?)

> Maybe pg_util should only be for tools which connect to PostgreSQL over the
> TCP (or a unix socket) while the all other tools, which need access to the
> data directory, should have their own executables?

That would be the idea, yes.

Christoph



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Akshay Joshi
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_policy_ddl() function to reconstruct CREATE POLICY statement
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17