On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 12:34:56PM +0100, Mircea Cadariu wrote:
> So far so good!
Yes, the buildfarm has not been complaining.
> About the main issue, seems to me the consensus is that dropping unnamed
> portals more aggressively is the way to go?
At the cost of one extra hash table lookup, that unlikely does not
matter for performance anyway. I guess so.
It's not something that can be backpatched. We need to make sure that
the documentation about an unnamed portal drop happening on a
follow-up BIND query is fixed. If somebody would like to send a
refresh patch, including for how the tests change, that would be
welcome here.
--
Michael
