On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 08:17:01AM +0200, KAZAR Ayoub wrote:
>>> I'm also trying the idea of doing SIMD inside quotes with prefix XOR
>>> using carry less multiplication avoiding the slow path in all cases even
>>> with weird looking input, but it needs to take into consideration the
>>> availability of PCLMULQDQ instruction set with <wmmintrin.h> and here we
>>> go, it quickly starts to become dirty OR we can wait for the decision to
>>> start requiring x86-64-v2 or v3 which has SSE4.2 and AVX2.
>
> [...]
>
> Currently we are at 200-400Mbps which isn't that terrible compared to
> production and non production grade parsers (of course we don't only parse
> in our case), also we are using SSE2 only so theoretically if we add
> support for avx later on we'll have even better numbers.
> Maybe more micro optimizations to the current heuristic can squeeze it more.
I'd greatly prefer that we stick with SSE2/Neon (i.e., simd.h) unless the
gains are extraordinary. Beyond the inherent complexity of using
architecture-specific intrinsics, you also have to deal with configure-time
checks, runtime checks, and function pointer overhead juggling. That tends
to be a lot of work for the amount of gain.
--
nathan
