On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 11:22:29PM +0200, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> I suggest mentioning that new entries should be at the top, that the list
> should be in reverse chronological order.
I felt that this was already covered in the existing commentary.
> Otherwise this looks great, love seeing it!
Thanks for looking. Now that we have a new run from baza that appears to
be using the updated baseline, I've committed the remaining patches.
For the rest of the back-branches, I'm considering starting with a baseline
of the latest minor version stamps. While it would be nice to have a
comprehensive history of the ABI compatibility for each major version,
we've lived this long without it, and I think it's unlikely that we'd act
on any breakages that predate the latest release set. Thoughts?
--
nathan
