On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 06:32:01PM +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> I'd leave it as uint64. There's no reason to mixup the signedness
> between these two variables.
That's fine as well.
> I'm happy to finish this one off. I was leaving it for Tomas to
> comment, but I think he'll be busy with pgconf.eu for the next few
> days.
Cool, thanks. I'm leaving that stuff up to any of you, have fun.
FWIW, I am on the same line as you. Your suggestions are better than
what the proposed patch does, as far as I've looked.
--
Michael