Re: PostgreSQL Contributor levels - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Christoph Berg
Subject Re: PostgreSQL Contributor levels
Date
Msg-id aOj5NNxXdghSX66R@msg.df7cb.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL Contributor levels  (Jimmy Angelakos <vyruss@hellug.gr>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL Contributor levels
Re: PostgreSQL Contributor levels
Re: PostgreSQL Contributor levels
Re: PostgreSQL Contributor levels
List pgsql-www
Re: Jimmy Angelakos
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> I think "Significant Contributor" fits in between "Major Contributor" and "Contributor".
> 
> "Sustained" has a time element and sounds terrible on a CV :-) , and "Recognised" is kind of redundant, since they're
allrecognition levels.
 

Hi,

sorry for the long silence here, it's been holiday and conferences and
work travel here for too long.

We liked the "Significant" idea very much and had almost already
settled on it when a new one came up: Notable Contributor. The levels
would then be:

Major Contributor
Notable Contributor
Contributor (see the other subthread)

How do people like that?

Frankly, "Significant" was apparently not sticking in anyone's brain,
we constantly had to look it up again because it was competing with
the other S-words "Sustained" and "Substantial". (Though I guess that
would work out if we actually chose it.)

Christoph



pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Wiki editor request
Next
From: Christoph Berg
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Contributor levels