Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
Date
Msg-id aOPwV_BghtMvLY5g@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct  6, 2025 at 11:13:24AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Uh, more accurately I run:
> 
> >     make --silent postgres.sgml
> >     make --silent check
> >     make check-tabs
> 
> If we included the tabs/nbsp checks in the normal build, then the
> first of those would cover everything.  Even as it is, I don't
> think the "make check" step is adding anything.

Looking at my test code, I do

    $ make postgres.sgml
    make: Nothing to be done for 'postgres.sgml'.

and my shell comment says it is so configure runs and can check that
works first, but it looks like it now does nothing.

I agree the "make --silent check-tabs" doesn't add anything because that
is already part of 'make check'.

I still would like to run checks without building the HTML.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we update the random_page_cost default value?
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we update the random_page_cost default value?