On Fri, Oct 03, 2025 at 10:03:32AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> That makes sense. Done in 0001 attached.
Done this one, with a tweak to use directly the index name, which is a
primary key from the test table.
> Thanks! Attached v3, split in 2 sub patches as discussed above (0002 is same
> as v2 except that the tests has been changed due to 0001).
And applied this one as well after a few tweaks, mainly consistency in
the code, with what should be the proper format bumps (thanks for the
notes in your proposed commit message).
--
Michael
