On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 09:24:03AM +0800, Chao Li wrote:
> On Sep 26, 2025, at 04:47, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I found that the for_all_table field in the AlterPublicationStmt is
>> not used at all unless I'm missing something. I've attached the patch
>> for only master that removes it.
>
> Yep, based on code of gram.y and the doc, FOR ALL TABLE is only
> supposed by CREATE PUBLICATION.
Indeed, good catch. There's no point for this field currently. As
far as I can see it is wrong since 665d1fad99e7, so I am betting on a
rebase mistake when the original feature has been reviewed.
--
Michael
