On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 03:45:21PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Hmm. This looks kind of explicit enough to document the purpose.
> The wording could be simplified a bit more. I'll take it from there.
Reworded a bit more the comments, and applied on HEAD. There could be
an argument for back-patching, I guess, but the lack of complaints is
also an indicator to not do so, and VACUUM is able to handle the
post-failure cleanup should an ERROR happen in flight when splitting
a page.
--
Michael
