On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 08:09:18AM -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 1:28 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>> Do we want to make the order of the checks to be more consistent in
>> both routines? These would require a separate set of double-checks
>> and review, but while we're looking at this area of the code we may as
>> tweak it more..
>
> That makes sense to me to avoid future questions such as mine.
Would somebody like to propose a patch? Doing so on this thread would
be OK for me, but perhaps it would be better to discuss that on a new
one as we would deal with a separate problem.
--
Michael