On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 10:26:12AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Saying that, this patch sounds like a good idea, making these code
> paths a bit more reliable for VACUUM, without paying the cost of an
> allocation. At least for HEAD, that's nice to have. Peter, what do
> you think?
Hearing nothing, I'm planning to have a second look at it and do
something on HEAD. Feel free if you have any comments.
--
Michael
