On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 02:01:14PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Committed.
I'm having some regrets about the changes to RequestNamedLWLockTranche().
Specifically, when it is first called, it immediately allocates an array
big enough to hold 256 requests (~17 KB), whereas it used to only allocate
space for 16 requests (~1 KB) and resize as needed. Furthermore, the
MAX_NAMED_TRANCHES check isn't actually needed because InitializeLWLocks()
will do the same check via its calls to LWLockNewTrancheId() for all the
named tranche requests.
--
nathan
