On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 01:44:22PM -0500, Sami Imseih wrote:
> Another approach is to just change GetNamedLWLockTranche to use
> NamedLWLockTrancheArray since that is already copied in EXEC_BACKEND, and
> allow GetNamedLWLockTranche to continue to be used outside of startup. In
> this case, we will need to add num_lwlocks field to
> NamedLWLockTrancheArray. This might be better to backpatch, since we will
> not be changing user facing behavior.
That seems like a reasonable thing to try. It looks like
NamedLWLockTrancheRequests is copied, too. Could we used that instead of
adding a new variable?
My guess is that this has been broken since this code was introduced in
commit c1772ad from 2016/v9.6, and AFAIK you are the first to report it, so
I don't feel a tremendous amount of urgency to fix it on the back-branches.
--
nathan