Re: Per backend relation statistics tracking - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bertrand Drouvot
Subject Re: Per backend relation statistics tracking
Date
Msg-id aK7UDwIswOzvMn/x@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Per backend relation statistics tracking  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 07:18:10AM -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2025-08-26 06:38:41 +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> > > and IO related counters aren't
> > > incremented remotely as often as the scan related counters are.
> > 
> > You mean the flush are not triggered as often? If so, yeah that's also something
> > you've mentioned ([1]) and that I've in mind to look at.
> 
> I mean that we increment the counters less frequently.
> pgstat_count_heap_getnext() is called for every tuple on a page, which is
> obviously much more frequent than once per page like for IO.

I see. So let's rely on the existing "relation" increments and make use of them
when flushing the relation stats to populate the backend stats (as done in v2
shared up-thread).

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrei Lepikhov
Date:
Subject: Re: plan shape work
Next
From: Antonin Houska
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]