On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 04:59:54PM +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
>
> > But we have observed the generated code being pretty grotty and it's caused
> > more than enough confusion - so let's just replace them with plain uint8's and
> > cast in switches.
>
> +1
>
> May be I am wrong, but it seems to me that after add-moissing-memory-barrier
> patch was applied nobody reproduced assertion failure with replaced
> bitfields.
>
Hi,
I am just a lurker but that was what I saw happen too. No problem with
the replaced bitfields.
Regards,
Ken
