On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 06:59:55PM +0300, Andrey Borodin wrote:
> FPWs are used here and there in a lot of places, like "FPI for
> hint". And indexes are build using FPI for many years, it did not
> start with 17...
> This list is not exhaustive in any case, so I agree that formulation
> should not be very strict.
Perhaps, yes, the formulation used in this paragraph could be a bit
more evasive. What we do not want is to keep a wording that would
require more maintenance each time the internals of the backend are
changed, so adding an extra "like" may be OK.
Do any of you have a specific wording in mind?
--
Michael
