On Wed, Aug 06, 2025 at 12:09:28PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2025 at 09:20:09PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> That explains it. I didn't find any past discussions about this particular
>> name, but commit de160e2 was being developed concurrently. I'll use
>> nameSpace instead.
>
> Committed.
Any thoughts on back-patching this? It's entirely cosmetic and could help
avoid some back-patching pain down the road. I originally chose not to
back-patch because it's not a bug and "namspace" has been there for a very
long time, but now I'm having second thoughts...
--
nathan
