On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 10:27:37AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes:
>> In my patch, I just added the missing DatumGetPointer() calls, which
>> seemed easy enough.
>
> I had an earlier patch version that also did that, but it seemed
> kind of verbose to me: adding "_D" is much shorter than adding
> "DatumGetPointer()", and fewer parens seems good for readability.
I have mixed feelings about that, but as long as one is easily able to
detect that they should not pass a Datum. At the end, I'm kind of
OK-ish with the addition of the _D flavors to have a shortcut for the
VARDATA/DatumGetPointer() patterns, as an option. So I'd put +0.5.
--
Michael