On Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 12:02:44PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 12:21:32AM -0700, Lukas Fittl wrote:
>> FWIW, I looked again at the MinGW sources and I think you're right that
>> intrin.h is likely also correct for MinGW. I originally thought that
>> cpuid.h would be correct, given that's whats used by GCC/clang, but I think
>> the MinGW source itself is authoritative here (vs the compiler in use), and
>> that has a intrin.h include ([0]) but no cpuid.h.
>
> Yeah. I have a close of MinGW locally, and that matches what I saw.
s/close/clone/.
> Applied on all the branches. Let's wait for the buildfarm to report,
> now.
The first reports are popping up for the Windows animals, and as far
as I can see things seem to tbe OK for now in terms of the flavors of
__cpuid & friends detected, for the mix of meson, MinGW, MSVC and
configure that we have.
--
Michael
