Re: AIO v2.5 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: AIO v2.5
Date
Msg-id aIj5nekHol8NnXKf@nathan
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: AIO v2.5  (Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>)
List pgsql-hackers
[RMT hat]

On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 03:51:12PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> In general, it doesn't change the earlier conclusions at all. Most of
> the earlier observations apply to these results from these machines with
> reasonably different types of storage. So I still think we should stick
> to "worker", but consider increasing the default number of workers.
> 
> It's possible there's machine with storage/hardware that would work
> better with some other io_method value, but that's why it's a GUC. The
> default should work for most systems.

Given there have been no further proposals or discussion, we have marked
the related open item as "Won't Fix".  This means we plan to ship v18 with
io_method=worker and io_workers=3 by default.

-- 
nathan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
Date:
Subject: Re: Support getrandom() for pg_strong_random() source
Next
From: Daniel Bauman
Date:
Subject: Re: Doc update proposal for the note on log_statement in the runtime config for logging page