Re: [PATCH] Refactor: Extract XLogRecord info - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [PATCH] Refactor: Extract XLogRecord info
Date
Msg-id aEfgs1rHM8XX5HeS@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Refactor: Extract XLogRecord info  (Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Refactor: Extract XLogRecord info
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 10:54:43PM -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> The refactoring LGTM but do we really need two patches? IMHO you can just
> merge everything into a single patch.

FWIW, I'm not sure what's the benefit of the proposal which comes down
to the removal of a bitwise NOT, except more code conflicts with back
branches.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PGSERVICEFILE as part of a normal connection string
Next
From: wenhui qiu
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Refactor: Extract XLogRecord info