On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 08:05:20PM -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> There has been plenty discussion about GB18030, and it seems we aren't likely
> to be able to drop that.
Yes, as per upthread.
> I think there are a lot easier cases though. The easiest probably is
> MULE_INTERNAL - all discussions referencing it seem to be about oddities of
> MULE_INTERNAL, not about using it. I think it's been effectively unused since
> it's introduction. Due to not even having a conversion path to UTF-8 it's
> really not practically usable IMO.
Perhaps, yes. I still need to do some homework here and gather some
data to share, FWIW.
--
Michael
