Re: Jacob Champion
> I think the system is overconstrained at that point. If you want to
> support clients that delay-load the ABI they're compiled against,
> _and_ have them continue to work seamlessly after the system has
> upgraded the ABI underneath them, without restarting the client... is
> there any option other than side-by-side installation?
My point is that we should be trying to change the ABI-as-coded-in-the-
filename as rarely as possible. Then side-by-side should not be required.
Christoph
