Re: Proper relational database? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From John R Pierce
Subject Re: Proper relational database?
Date
Msg-id a9d9a4fc-879c-cedb-b5b1-63396f3672bf@hogranch.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proper relational database?  (<david@andl.org>)
Responses Re: Proper relational database?
Re: Proper relational database?
List pgsql-general
On 4/22/2016 7:04 PM, david@andl.org wrote:
Absolutely not. SQL is a (nearly) full implementation of the relational algebra, plus other non-relational stuff. The only thing it really can't handle is a table with no columns! (I have to fake that)


a table with no columns would have no primary key...  doesn't that violate one of the fundamental tenets of the relational model ?



-- 
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From:
Date:
Subject: Re: Proper relational database?
Next
From: Raymond Brinzer
Date:
Subject: Re: Proper relational database?