Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrei Lepikhov
Subject Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query
Date
Msg-id a9d68fe2-5c97-4d84-8354-4b0838a95f3f@gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query
List pgsql-hackers
On 25/06/2026 11:43, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 10:35 AM Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 1. pg_log_query_plan - This function just sends a signal. There are no
>> guarantees that actual action will be performed. So, the 'request' word makes
>> more sense for me.
> 
> I don't agree with this particular comment. Of course nothing is
> absolutely guaranteed because the database system could crash or the
> world could end, but if the target backend is running a query, it
> should log the query plan. Therefore, I don't see the need for a word
> like "request".
> 

Ok, so just mention this behaviour in the documentation - let people know that
they should potentially wait for a minute or two more to see the EXPLAIN.
Real-life with huge queries and big machines provide us with examples where a
backend might delay a response to a signal for quite a substantial time.

Sometimes nothing happens after such an async operation, and we need to identify
the problem: has the backend stalled, is the ‘logging plan’ algorithm
ineffective, or is something else happening?

-- 
regards, Andrei Lepikhov,
pgEdge



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Aleksander Alekseev
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix null pointer dereference in PG19
Next
From: Nishant Sharma
Date:
Subject: Re: Show hashed SAOP decision in EXPLAIN