On Wed, 2021-01-20 at 12:58 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Aha, that was a good clue, I had overlooked the required extensions in the CSR.
> Re-reading RFC 5280 it seems we need keyEncipherment, dataEncipherment and
> digitalSignature to create a valid SSL Server certificate. Adding those indeed
> make the test pass. Skimming the certutil code *I think* removing it as you
> did cause a set of defaults to kick in that made it work based on the parameter
> "--nsCertType sslServer", but it's not entirely easy to make out.
Lovely. I didn't expect *removing* an extension to effectively *add*
more, but I'm glad it works now.
==
To continue the Subject Common Name discussion [1] from a different
part of the thread:
Attached is a v23 version of the patchset that peels the raw Common
Name out from a client cert's Subject. This allows the following cases
that the OpenSSL implementation currently handles:
- subjects that don't begin with a CN
- subjects with quotable characters
- subjects that have no CN at all
Embedded NULLs are now handled in a similar manner to the OpenSSL side,
though because this failure happens during the certificate
authentication callback, it results in a TLS alert rather than simply
closing the connection.
For easier review of just the parts I've changed, I've also attached a
since-v22.diff, which is part of the 0001 patch.
--Jacob
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7d6a23a7e30540b486abc823f7ced7a93e1da1e8.camel%40vmware.com
