Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use?
Date
Msg-id a9a175c3-164b-6997-8b97-c04d1c2df753@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use?
List pgsql-bugs

On 09/24/2017 07:06 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> So I think we should just stop with the blacklist test for v10,
> and then see if we still get complaints (and exactly what they're
> about) so that we can judge how much more work the problem deserves.
> It's still ahead of where we were in previous releases, and ahead of
> where we'd be if we end up reverting the patch altogether.
>
>


That's pretty much what I was saying.

cheers

andrew

-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use?
Next
From: hvisage@gmail.com
Date:
Subject: [BUGS] BUG #14827: "ALTER TABLE... IF NOT EXISTS...ADD.. BIGSERIAL" leavesextra sequences