Re: Issue in pg_catalog.pg_indexes view definition - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: Issue in pg_catalog.pg_indexes view definition
Date
Msg-id a96421bd-5842-0000-7a76-c23502a55640@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Issue in pg_catalog.pg_indexes view definition  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2016/07/14 17:07, Amit Langote wrote:
> Can we say that pg_get_indexdef() has "side-effects" because it can error
> like this?  Shouldn't such a function be marked *volatile*?  Because if I
> do so by updating pg_proc, the plan changes (perhaps) to a safe one in
> this context:

Didn't mean to write: "Because if I do so..."

Instead: "If I do so..."

Thanks,
Amit





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Issue in pg_catalog.pg_indexes view definition
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: unexpected psql "feature"