Re: Redis 16 times faster than Postgres? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron
Subject Re: Redis 16 times faster than Postgres?
Date
Msg-id a88ffd9c-04d7-a0c1-376c-918545eb4020@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Redis 16 times faster than Postgres?  (Steve Litt <slitt@troubleshooters.com>)
Responses Re: Redis 16 times faster than Postgres?
List pgsql-general
On 9/29/19 8:09 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 07:46:14 +1000
> Nathan Woodrow <madmanwoo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Redis is a in memory database so I would except it to be always much
>> faster..
> Is there a way to have Redis periodically update an on-disk backup?
> That would be great, but otherwise you're at the mercy of your power
> company (here in Central Florida it's routine for power to go down and
> stay down for five hours).

It would be criminal for it not to have an async writer process flushing 
modified pages to disk.  And to not have a UPS that you've tested.

-- 
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: raf
Date:
Subject: Re: Redis 16 times faster than Postgres?
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Redis 16 times faster than Postgres?