Re: HAVE_WORKING_LINK still needed? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: HAVE_WORKING_LINK still needed?
Date
Msg-id a7f8c2d5-dccd-e9dc-859f-6fc5f1581b03@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: HAVE_WORKING_LINK still needed?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2020-03-04 17:37, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Here is the third patch again, we renaming durable_link_or_rename() to
> durable_rename_excl().  This seems to match existing Unix system call
> naming best (see open() flag O_EXCL, and macOS has a renamex_np() flag
> RENAME_EXCL).

committed like that

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hugh McMaster
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use PKG_CHECK_MODULES to detect the libxml2 library
Next
From: Hugh McMaster
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use PKG_CHECK_MODULES to detect the libxml2 library