Re: pg_upgrade from 9.4 to 10.4 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: pg_upgrade from 9.4 to 10.4
Date
Msg-id a7d976bf-9eac-992b-2d51-76bcb17242d7@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade from 9.4 to 10.4  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade from 9.4 to 10.4
List pgsql-hackers

On 07/31/2018 07:08 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 06:29:34PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 03:26:47PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> This patch evidently broke build farm member jacana, although only
>>>> in the 9.3 branch.  It's been failing with
>>>> Jul 28 23:22:30 The system cannot find the path specified.
>>> Well, that's interesting.  I have a test script that upgrades all
>>> version combinations of Postgres from 9.3 to head and it worked for me.
>>> However, I now see that the tests for checking a live server were wrong,
>>> and 9.3 must have a slightly different test than the others.  Fixes
>>> applied.  Thanks for finding this so quickly.
>> After poking around a bit more, I think the more likely explanation is
>> that 9.3 was still using the SYSTEMQUOTE macro in commands to be popen'd,
>> and you did not make that adjustment when back-patching into that branch.
>> Note the adjacent pre-existing invocation of pg_controldata:
>>
>>      snprintf(cmd, sizeof(cmd), SYSTEMQUOTE "\"%s/%s \"%s\"" SYSTEMQUOTE,
>>               cluster->bindir,
>>               live_check ? "pg_controldata\"" : "pg_resetxlog\" -n",
> Oh, jacana must be a Windows server with spaces in the file name paths.
> Fixed.  Thanks again.  I really didn't want to backpatch the original
> fix but had to since it could produce corrupt upgrades.
>


It is a Windows machine, but there should be any spaces in the paths.

cheers

andrew

-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?
Next
From: Ning Yu
Date:
Subject: Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for PostgreSQL