Re: A test for replay of regression tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: A test for replay of regression tests
Date
Msg-id a7571134-2eae-a760-cb0e-262db39fa9fe@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A test for replay of regression tests  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: A test for replay of regression tests
Re: A test for replay of regression tests
List pgsql-hackers
On 1/21/22 16:22, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 1/21/22 13:58, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 3:42 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks.  I added that and pushed.  Let's see if fairywren likes it
>>> when it comes back online.
>> A watched pot never boils, but I wonder why Andrew's 4 Windows
>> configurations jacana, bowerbird, fairywren and drongo have stopped
>> returning results.
>
>
> I think I have unstuck both machines. I will keep an eye on them and
> make sure they don't get stuck again.
>
>

fairywren is not happy with the recovery tests still.


I have noticed on a different setup that this test adds 11 minutes to
the runtime of the recovery tests, effectively doubling it. The doubling
is roughly true on faster setups, too. At least I would like a simple
way to disable the test.


I'm not very happy about that.


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Two noncritical bugs of pg_waldump
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Creation of an empty table is not fsync'd at checkpoint