On Sun, 19 Oct 2025, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> That depends on what you do with the table.
Laurenz,
That makes sense.
> Are your SQL statements simple and natural with the current design?
> Then stick with what you have now.
That's what I'm going to do. I was curious when a timestamp column was more
efficient, or otherwise preferred, since only a couple of my databases have
a table with both date and time. And neither has many rows, but one could be
quite large some time in the future.
Thanks very much,
Rich
