Re: bitmap-index-scan slower than normal index scan - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Alex Deucher
Subject Re: bitmap-index-scan slower than normal index scan
Date
Msg-id a728f9f90707111301k57f54bddqa563728755957d75@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bitmap-index-scan slower than normal index scan  ("Alex Deucher" <alexdeucher@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On 7/11/07, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/11/07, A. Kretschmer <andreas.kretschmer@schollglas.com> wrote:
> > am  Wed, dem 11.07.2007, um 14:52:01 -0400 mailte Alex Deucher folgendes:
> > > >Okay, i got a really different plan, but i expected _NOT_ a
> > > >performance-boost like this. I expected the opposite.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >It's not a really problem, i just played with this. But i'm confused
> > > >about this...
> > > >
> > >
> > > your results are getting cached.  try two queries in a row with the same
> > > plan.
> >
> > Thanks for the response, but I've done this, no difference.
> >
>
> try bumping up the default stats target on the table in question and
> see if that helps the planner choose a better plan.
>

and be sure to run analyze again.

Alex

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Alex Deucher"
Date:
Subject: Re: bitmap-index-scan slower than normal index scan
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: bitmap-index-scan slower than normal index scan