On 3/2/07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> "Alex Deucher" <alexdeucher@gmail.com> writes:
> > Anyway, new numbers after the analyze.
> > Unfortunately, they are improved, but still not great:
>
> Why are the index names different between the old and new servers?
> Is that just cosmetic, or is 8.2 actually picking a different
> (and less suitable) index for the c1 queries?
>
That's just cosmetic. They are the same.
Alex
