Re: Why must AUTOCOMMIT be ON to do txn control in plpgsql procedure? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Adrian Klaver
Subject Re: Why must AUTOCOMMIT be ON to do txn control in plpgsql procedure?
Date
Msg-id a66efc71-6dca-0f46-d667-2fb29526c840@aklaver.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why must AUTOCOMMIT be ON to do txn control in plpgsql procedure?  (Luca Ferrari <fluca1978@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 8/7/19 12:15 AM, Luca Ferrari wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 12:19 AM Bryn Llewellyn <bryn@yugabyte.com> wrote:
>> 1. my call p2() starts a txn.

> Luca
> 
> P.S:
> I don't believe that asking on a public mailing list for a company to
> answer is the right thing to do, you can always ask themselves on your
> own.

Sort of moot as PROCEDURE is a Postgres feature not a company feature.


-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Daniel Fink (PDF)"
Date:
Subject: pg_wal fills up on big update query
Next
From: Rob Sargent
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_wal fills up on big update query