On 07/05/2017 08:31 AM, Hans Schou wrote:
> 2017-07-05 15:41 GMT+02:00 Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
> <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>>:
>
>
> [scheme[<+>dsn]]://[[username[:[password]]@][host][:port][/[dbname][/[[table[/[column[,column...]*]]]|sql]]]
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> The thing is that in a quick search on this I did not find a
> reference implementation of this to compare against.
>
>
> "dsn" is only relevant when the scheme is ODBC.
That was formatting error on my part, I was trying to point to the back
half of the URI. The part with the table/column/sql sections.
>
> In a situation where an application (like Drupal) get connect string
> (URI) it should be able to find the right driver to use. In case with of
> ODBC, a dsn (Data Source Name) is needed.
>
> ./hans
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
