Hello Robert,
06.06.2024 19:36, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 6:00 AM Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Am I missing something or the the page buffer indeed lacks locking there?
> I don't know, but if the locks are really missing now, I feel like the
> first question is "which commit got rid of them?". It's a little hard
> to believe that they've never been there and somehow nobody has
> noticed.
>
> Then again, maybe we have; see Noah's thread about in-place updates
> breaking stuff and some of the surprising discoveries there. But it
> seems worth investigating.
Yes, my last experiment with memcmp for the whole buffer was wrong,
given the comment above heapgettup_pagemode(). I think the correct
check would be:
ItemId lpp;
OffsetNumber lineoff;
+ItemIdData iid;
lineoff = scan->rs_vistuples[lineindex];
lpp = PageGetItemId(page, lineoff);
+iid = *((ItemIdData *)lpp);
+for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
+Assert(memcmp(&iid, lpp, sizeof(iid)) == 0);
It significantly alleviates reproducing of the test failure for me.
Will try to bisect this anomaly tomorrow.
Best regards,
Alexander
