Re: Database versus filesystem for storing images - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Clodoaldo
Subject Re: Database versus filesystem for storing images
Date
Msg-id a595de7a0701060523k76d4fb25lfbd3fed6e38e3155@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Database versus filesystem for storing images  (Clodoaldo <clodoaldo.pinto.neto@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
2007/1/6, Andrew Chernow <andrew@esilo.com>:
>  >>>apache has very good page and image caching.  You could take advantage
>  >>>of that using this technique.
>
>  > I wonder why this HTTP cache headers argument didn't surface in this
>  > heated debate.
>
> I did other up this argument by the way.

Sorry, I understood you were talking about server side caching while
what I refer to is client side caching.

Regards,
--
Clodoaldo Pinto Neto

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Clodoaldo
Date:
Subject: Re: Database versus filesystem for storing images
Next
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: Database versus filesystem for storing images